Mark H wrote: > I also notice that Redbus were complaining (perhaps quite > rightly) that they > hadn't been given all the financial information that would > enable them to > make an accurate bid, as opposed to Bates.
Bates wouldn't be complaining about not having access to management accounts etc would he? He has permanently had access. He knows where the ST money is AND he knows where the Nicholls money has gone - Redbus, Morris, Wilkinson et al don't, so I can see why they would be asking for this information. > > Within the day LUST have issued a press release asking that > KPMG allow all > bidders the financial information, delaying the deadline for offers if > necessary. You think that this is an unfair request? Surely it's the same request that we have been asking of MP's and the Football League all weekend. > > I wonder if LUST support the Redbus bid? > What are you inferring? Are you really that evil a piece of work? Why does everybody and everything have to have an ulterior motive? Why can't you just accept that some of us want to do the right thing? Paul PS I would never use wikipedia as a source because its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the Internet, simply by clicking the edit this page link. Using Wikipedia as a source is just lazy research, imho. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
