Rick, I really couldn't give a toss about what you did. I specifically said on my email to keep me out of your media dealings - that's your thing. You didn't but then again that's what I expected. You are a joke.
--- RickD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > >I think this must have rattled Rick a > > bit 'cos he then proceeded to send my name to all > his > > media outlets as an independent voice of the fans. > > What a wanky thing to do. Sort of thing I'd expect > > from a 10 year old. > > That is an interesting version of events. It is in > fact the sort of > interpretation that a ten year old might put on it. > You were moaning on list > that the Trust view was not one you recognised so I > handed you the > opportunity to put an alternative view. Your email > address went to three > well respected and trustworthy local media people > whose job it is to reflect > what is going on and what the fans really think > about it, together with > your complaint that the alternative was not being > heard. They were given > the opportuntiy to see the nature of what your views > were (i.e. a fans view > which was different from the views that the Trust > was expressing) and to ask > you for your comments from a totally different point > of view to the one that > you were complaining about. I sent you a copy so > that you were fully aware > of it. I have no idea if they emailed you asking for > your point of view or > not, nor have I any idea if you gave them your views > or not. That was > entirely your choice and if you decided to turn down > the opportunity to make > your alternative views known then the worst that you > would have experienced > would be three emails which you decided not to > respond to. I'm sure that > they would be quite short, and quite polite > invitations to speak for the > fans who were not being heard according to you. All > 3 of these reporters > would have taken views from you without attributing > them to you in person if > that is what you wanted. Nobody would have been > aware of it until now when > you posted it on here. What is the point of > complaining about others putting > views that you do not agree with and from > organisations that you do not > recognise if you don't actually want any alternative > view to be aired ? > You make it sound as if sky sports were chasing you > with a camera crew or as > if you were getting pestered unexpectedly by > paparazzi. Sounds like somebody > was rattled but not myself I think. If you are not > even prepared to give the > local media the alternative viewpoint anonymously > and by bloody email than > how can anyone be expected to give any credence to > your complaints ? You > can't please some people. By the way, I think two of > them read the list > every day. > > > _______________________________________________ > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and > the list administrators accept no liability for the > personal views and opinions of contributors. > Leedslist mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at > www.lufctrust.org > ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it now. http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
