Well it is still potentially valid, after all don't the FL want the new buyout scrapped and go back to the existing CVA?
If that happened would people write to their mps again and ask them to urge HMRC to drop their case? I guess it isn't just a case of who is actually blocking bates, but who (still) wants him blocked. That is also potentially valid as whichever parties are able to block him (FL) might take some sustenance from some public support for their actions. I think all Leeds fans should be concentrating on the FL granting the golden share, instead of vague flower protests which every party could take some encouragement from as it isn't focussed on any one goal apart from a general mourning over what is happening to the club. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:leedslist- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RickD > Sent: 25 July 2007 12:48 > To: leedslist > Subject: Re: [LU] Public boll*x > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Those people who wrote to their mp prompting them to ask hmrc to > challenge > > the cva? > > Ah, I get it now. Thanks. > I thought you were talking about whatever is going on at the moment. > > > _______________________________________________ > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list > administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions > of contributors. > Leedslist mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
