Paul - Your first and last lines give you away Im afraid When will you figure it out that its NOT ABOUT BATES, ITS ABOUT HAVING A FOOTBALL TEAM
Then again you seem to want us to be like Halifax or York or play without reserves ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Cundell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:29 AM Subject: Re: [LU] Another ste of idiots? > Pete Cass cried with Batesed breath: - >> >> You can't be serious. >> > >> > Yes I can. >> >> Well hows about starting sometime soon, >> Instead of trotting out the same old "Bates done it first" line >> > > How about you try typing sentences instead of just a collection of words? > Sean said I can't be serious, meaning I can't mean what I'd written, I > said > yes I can - how does your comment make any sense in that context? > >> > A debatable point but the technicality is probably too fine >> to define on >> > here. >> >> Too fine?? Arrogant git > > How is it arrogant? I explained to you offlist how difficult it was to get > the correct emphasis over via postings and that some things were better > not > said than causing even greater confusion. You didn't respond so I assumed > you agreed. Though I see now you just can't resist an opportunity to point > score in public and aren't interested in valid debate. > >> - We have 20 paid players atm with 16 >> days to go > > So? We need 11 players as I recall to form a team. As low as 7 before the > match is abandoned, I think. > >> (does the transfer window shut then too?) > > You really are showing your ignorance now, Transfer window closes August > 31st, though as we haven't the money to pay the players I fail to see how > we'd find money to buy players. Maybe if we hadn't blown thousands on a > jolly haunt around Europe, we could have paid the players. > >> ATM we cant run a >> reserves side. > > So what? It's also debatable if we need one, Keegan abolished the reserves > at Newcastle United when they were a division above us now. > Stop being so dramatic. > >> So yes its debatable, if your one eyed, blinkered and arguementative > > You stopped making sense again Pete. > > But as you insist here is an explanation: - Halifax Town and York City are > football clubs. Neither Halifax Town nor York City have a 'golden share', > therefore it is not essential for a football club to have a golden share. > >> > You >> > appear to have conveniently forgotten that these two groups were and >> > probably still are intrinsically linked and have so >> obviously manipulated >> > the situation so that they and they alone remained in >> control of the club >> > to >> > the DETRIMENT of the club. >> >> The FL is not the focus of our ire. Its getting the Golden >> Share back so we >> have a squad, a team and a club. > > The point you seem to miss is that we would have the golden share back > already had the administration not been conducted in the manner it was. If > Bates hadn't decided to play Russian Roulette with HMRC and the FL, he may > well have a debt free club now. > >> We all know what Bates has >> done, is doing, > > Do you? Do you really? > >> and if we were ever to momentarily shift our focus away your >> incessant posts >> are there to remind us - constantly, repetitively, annoyingly > > Pete, are you the self proclaimed list censor? > >> >> As it stands they have either (or both): >> A: Come out of Administration through a CVA with over 75% of >> the vote, > > Which was legally challenged and then scrapped by the administrators > because > Bates refused to fund the club until the court hearing, which you > conveniently omit. > >> AND/OR >> B. Bought the club in a fair and legal bidding process - >> details of which a >> previous post said would be made available to creditors on Friday?? > > A purchase that doesn't follow football league rules regarding clubs in > administration - which you also conveniently omit. > >> >> Get used to it, Bates is our current Chairman > > We don't even know if he's legally allowed to be a director never mind our > chairman - so you get used to it. > >> - Try shifting >> your focus to >> ensure we have a club he can be Chairman of > > You say that as if it is treacherous to question the members of the board, > yet we all were foolish not to question Ridsdale's crew. > >> .... or you can go >> and lay some >> flowers if you like >> > > Already have done, Pete - And a shirt on the 'Save Our Club' washing line. > > Paul > Love Leeds, Hate Bates > > Paul > > > _______________________________________________ > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators > accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. > Leedslist mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org > > __________ NOD32 2424 (20070726) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
