Mark Humphries wrote: ================= >> >> I understood that the challenge to the CVA was based upon the voting >> eligibility of Astor et al, due to the perceived/potential/ex links >> with Bates, and that were they not independent their vote wouldn't >> count and therefore the CVA wouldn't have been voted through?
Not what was said in the letter from KPMG to creditors. They listed a number of issues. >> Are you saying that the challenge was actually the preferential >> creditor issue all along? No buit is what should have been uppermost in all concerned's minds from day 1 >> Perhaps Bates isn't as clever/devious after all, he should have closed >> down ER and ground shared with Sheff Wed and waited for the floods to >> come... well he has got a close mate from the rust belt in Hemingham....................... _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
