> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Humphries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 August 2007 14:43 > To: 'John Boocock' > Subject: RE: [LU] The final countdown > > John, > > I understood that the challenge to the CVA was based upon the voting > eligibility of Astor et al, due to the perceived/potential/ex links > with Bates, and that were they not independent their vote wouldn't > count and therefore the CVA wouldn't have been voted through? > > Also, when I said 'technicality', I meant it was based on a technical > point of order/process, rather than because they were simply unhappy > with the money they got. > > Are you saying that the challenge was actually the preferential > creditor issue all along? > > Also, how would any of those 'acts of god' prevent the successful > completion of a CVA buyout? I don't really understand why those would > be 'exceptional circumstances' although if you have been told that's > what they had in mind rather than a catch-all clause then so be it. > > Perhaps Bates isn't as clever/devious after all, he should have closed > down ER and ground shared with Sheff Wed and waited for the floods to > come...
_______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
