On Thu, August 2, 2007 4:57 pm, Terry Emmott wrote: > (a process that I concede is > >> legal, albeit I think that it was done fraudulently in this instance > > Sorry, but surely it can't be legal and fraudulent at the same time? > Fraud > by its very nature is illegal isn't it.
What I meant was that the general principle of a sale after the challenge once the administrator decides that the initial CVA is not viable is legal; but the way it was done in LUFC's case was fraudulent because of the connection to Astor. Which part of "in this instance" didn't you understand? - Sean _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
