Alec wrote: > You are the one doing the misreading.
I watched us play really well in the freezing cold and get a deserved 3 points yet an hour later read an email from you claiming we played ok, how is that misreading anything? > If you read my email I was not > being negative, but I know someone who is. Is your schizophrenia diagnosed yet? "> It was us 3 months ago!! But not now. We have a fight on our hands." Less than an hour after a win IS negative. > I don't think Norwich are f'cking brilliant (don't know where you got > that from), but they are above us in the league and have a knack of > pulling out wins late in games. "That's the form that earns becoming Champions of the league. I doubt this is an accident/coincidence. They must have both fitness and fight to keep doing it. Expect them to win the league. We will be 2nd." - that reads like you think Norwich are better than us. > Take a pill and stop attacking people who simply have a point of view. However, it seems that it's ok for you to 'attack' someone who simply has a point of view or maybe you're the only one who is allowed a point of view. Cheers Paul PS If you think that my email was an attack, you need a reality check PPS Maybe you should try taking a happy pill PPSS It was bloody cold last night PPPSS Remember these never ending postscripts? PPPSSS Thirkers invention as I recall PPPPSSS Notice how I removed the old footers? PPPPSSSS And now the footer for those of you still reading.... _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist www.leedslist.net
