With the exceptions of Ridsdale's honeymoon and some retrospective respect for Silver (indetectable at the time), we have always hated/ feared/ despised/ loathed LUs owners. Why would some other billionaire be different? Why would the club be any better? And if it was who would want to be Chelsea anyway?
I must admit I chuckled at the idea of Billy O'Naire - and I wondered if perhaps he was a cousin of Michael Knighton ;) Unfortunately, as we put up with the "football as a business" concept we have to put up with exactly the "owners" that we've always had. We could have an awful lot worse than Bates, and there's no guarantee we'd ever get better, however much money he had. Cheers, Damian On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:27 PM, John Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > dunno whether this is true or not, but has the situation 'had' to change > because of the requirements around declaration of ownership? Maybe this guy > was one of the previous shareholders, or not? Who knows? > > > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist and the hardest time in a sailor's day is to watch the sun as it sails away
