PUBLIC HEALTH
FUND THE SYSTEM

The following article was published in "The Guardian", newspaper
of the Communist Party of Australia in its issue of Wednesday,
July 28th, 1999. Contact address: 65 Campbell Street, Surry Hills.
Sydney. 2010 Australia. Phone: (612) 9212 6855 Fax: (612) 9281 5795.
Email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Webpage: http://www.peg.apc.org/~guardian
Subscription rates on request.
******************************

A conference of State and Territory leaders meeting in Sydney
last weekend agreed that the delivery of health services in
Australia is under unsustainable stress. Amazingly, this
conference of national and state leaders did not mention the two
key factors behind the stress on the public health system: lack
of government funding for public hospitals, and the billions of
dollars being diverted from the public system to prop up the
inefficient and costly private health insurance system.

Funding for public health has for a long time been a political
football kicked about between state and federal government.
Neither level of government wants responsibility for funding
public hospitals and both have constantly sought the ways and
means to cut the level of funding.

This is reflected in the conference finding all sorts of reasons
to explain why the system is under stress: the ageing population,
technological and scientific advances, inefficient practices,
rising costs, shortages of skills etc.

The reality is that the hospital systems are under-funded, which
is why health workers and, in NSW at least, doctors and
specialists, are up in arms.

Funding for the public hospital system in NSW has been cut to the
point of near-collapse of parts of the public hospital system. In
Victoria health workers have been left with no option but to
carry out a concerted industrial campaign (see story page 4). All
the states and territories are experiencing similar problems.

A prime example is Sydney's Westmead Hospital in the western
suburbs, where funding cuts have resulted in a reduction in the
number of beds from 1,000 in 1979 to 750 today. A proposed
further cut of $9.5 million dollars will see the number of beds
reduced to 660.

At Westmead, cancer patients have been forced to wait up to six
weeks for urgent surgery. In the week preceding the conference,
12 heart attack patients had to wait hours for treatment in the
accident and emergency unit because no beds could be made
available.

The unit itself has recently been forced to close at least once a
week for other than life threatening cases.

The Premiers resolved that there should be an inquiry into the
efficiency, effectiveness and future profitability of the
delivery of health services in Australia, with a draft report
submitted within one year and the final report within 18 months.

A number of organisations have called for an increase in the
Medicare levy to help cover the costs of running state public
hospitals.

The Public Health Association of Australia this week said that a
one percent increase in the levy would largely solve the funding
problem, without resort to means testing of patients.

The Queensland and Tasmanian Labor Governments have expressed
opposition to any downgrading of the current level of service or
change to the funding arrangements and the introduction of "co-
payments" for treatment at public hospitals has been proposed by
the governments of Western and South Australia.

Under this scheme a patient would be forced to pay part of the
cost of treatment at public hospitals, which is currently free of
charge. The Carr Labor Government in NSW is giving the co-payment
proposal a sympathetic hearing.

Victorian Premier Jeff Kennett wants to go much further. He wants
to see the Medicare levy scrapped and all but the most destitute
of patients forced to take out private health insurance, or pay
the full cost of treatment.

Kennett is supported in this by the Australian Medical
Association which has campaigned for many years for the user-pays
system for public hospital treatment and the scrapping of
Medicare.

The Australian Council for Social Services, the Public Health
Association of Australia, the Brotherhood of St Laurence, the
Australian Consumers' Association and the Catholic Healthcare
Association all called for the State and Territory leaders to
reject calls for "user pays" policies in any form for public
hospitals.

The ACTU has also indicated its vigorous opposition to the
proposals, pointing out such a move would create a two-tiered
health system.

ACTU Assistant Secretary Greg Combet said that Medicare had
enabled Australians to have equitable access to the highest
standards of health care at a relatively low cost.

"Medicare is one of the cornerstones of the social wage, and
universal, free access to health care is of critical importance
to workers and their families. To propose that public hospitals
charge patients would inevitably lead to a US-style, two-tiered
system", he said.

The real aim of the proposed inquiry is to prepare public opinion
for the undermining of Medicare with the possible introduction of
means testing, co-payments and other measures that would
eventually lead to the destruction of Medicare as we know it and
the establishment of two systems -- where the quality of service
depends on your ability to pay.

Australians have voted with their feet for Medicare as a system
of universal health insurance, with bulk billing and "free"
hospital treatment as central features.

One public health system is the best and most efficient way of
providing health services for all Australians, rich and poor. The
public health system, including Medicare, must be defended in its
entirety.

The Guardian  65 Campbell Street, Surry Hills. 2010
Australia.
Email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Website:  http://www.peg.apc.org/~guardian






Reply via email to