Mark, They all seem to be different.  That's why I don't give 
measurements.  You do have to fit it for you,  the concept is still a 
workable one :>)  There are many ways to skin a  .. . . . never mind :>)  I 
think that I control the whole mess thing about 99 per cent.  Don't forget 
to throw a couple of show curtain over the top.  I clamp them to the router 
carriage and then if follows the carriage.

BTY, the legacy workstation series (4 videos?) is the fine dust part and 
shop vac build. 
Have a great day,
Russ

On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 11:30:01 AM UTC-6, Mark wrote:
>
> Thanks Russ.  I have watched the one video where you show the panels and 
> the container to catch the sawdust.  You mentioned the idea of putting two 
> air filters over the LOM, but I guess i need to keep watching ;).
>
> I have a catch basin underneath the unit but was more worried about the 
> fine dust than the chips.
>
> I liked your video on adjusting the height of the lathe.  The 1000 doesnt 
> seem to have the same cross bar to rest the lower structure.  I'm going to 
> have to fix that or find an alternative solution.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019, 11:36 AM russ veinot <ru...@cpamomy.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Mark, I have done multiple dust collection videos, if you haven't watched 
>> them.  Collecting chips on the LOM is like herding cats.  My idea about 
>> dust collection is let the chips fall where they may.  By that I mean I 
>> would put a floor in the bottom of the LOM and sliding panels on the sides 
>> (& ends) and then the bottom of the LOM acts like a catch basin.  When 
>> using the LOM I put a plastic shroud over the top on both side of the 
>> router carriage and this allows the chips to fall into the bottom.  I also 
>> have a chute in the center of the lathe basin to brush the chips out into a 
>> trash container when done.  Then I vacuum the rails to clear chips in the 
>> LOM moving parts.  
>>
>> The unspoken issue with the LOM is not the chips but is the airborne dust 
>> created by the chip monster.  When using it, you will find fine dust 
>> collecting all over the flat surfaces in the shop.  To control the fine 
>> dust, I built a cabinet on the ceiling over the LOM and installed a strong 
>> fan with an air filter system to suck the fine dust before it floats all 
>> over the shop.  I also installed a shop vac in the cabinet with easy 
>> emptying dust collection bucket. This makes cleaning the LOM easy and thus 
>> allows me to clean it when needed.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 9:09:08 AM UTC-6, Mark wrote:
>>>
>>> Not trying to divert the topic, but while I can see how building an 
>>> enclosure underneath the LOM will help, what about the fines?
>>>
>>> The porter cable router that came with my newly acquired pre-owned 1000 
>>> has absolutely no dust control.    What is everyone doing for the fine 
>>> dust?  Sticking a 4 to 6" dust port in the general area and assuming it 
>>> will suck up most of it?  I have an oneida cyclone, but if I put anything 
>>> else near the port, it will probably suck it up too.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019, 9:47 AM rtju...@gmail.com <rtju...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In the process of putting together my new LOM, I noted a number of 
>>>> references to dust collection and just how many chips these machines 
>>>> develop. I really didnt care for the chip bag skirt supplies with the 
>>>> machine. After hearing of these experiences and watching some videos, I 
>>>> decided to build some side shields that will sit in the outer rail slots. 
>>>> This will cause a good number of the chips to fall straight down where 
>>>> they 
>>>> can be swept up and vacuumed into the collector or shoveled into bags. 
>>>>
>>>> Once installed on the LOM I will send finished pictures. My vanity said 
>>>> "paint the parts to match your new machine." I said "Ok." 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Legacy Ornamental Mills" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to legacy-ornamental-mills+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/legacy-ornamental-mills/1755108962.926296.1574002040753%40mail.yahoo.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/legacy-ornamental-mills/1755108962.926296.1574002040753%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Legacy Ornamental Mills" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to legacy-ornamental-mills+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/legacy-ornamental-mills/660aa8f9-4fba-47e7-8f23-590eaf69f46d%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/legacy-ornamental-mills/660aa8f9-4fba-47e7-8f23-590eaf69f46d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Legacy Ornamental Mills" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to legacy-ornamental-mills+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/legacy-ornamental-mills/7d084a1e-b4ab-4791-be76-2468f8281cf1%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to