You are quite right about geo database not being as
accurate outside the USA. The problem is not in the method but in the
content of the database. The geo database concept is not limited to the
USA. If that database were regularly updated (as I stated), it would
eventually become more valuable for all locations worldwide. Also, updates
would correct erroneous data that is currently in the database such that a full
file compare against it would show locations that were previously considered
correct but are no longer valid. Again, these kind of errors would
diminish over time if the geo database was updated regularly. Every
location can be spelled and punctuated correctly as well as adjusted for time
sensitivity regardless of language or its point on the globe. It may not
be possible in the short run but we should begin the process such that it will
happen in a future version. Even the ideas of the core and core plus
locations have improved and standardized many data sets. We all know that
a merge will be more likely when the various pieces considered for duplicates
are similar and the location fields are key elements in determining those
matches.
Ron Taylor
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ For online technical support, please visit http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp |
- Re: [LegacyUG] Prepositions with location names Ron Taylor
- Re: [LegacyUG] Prepositions with location names Terry Foxcroft