I haven't spoken out on this subject before but proper sourcing is a very
high priority for me, so if someone is tracking List activity to determine
interest level, I'll add my voice to the clamor.  Legacy:  Please heed the
excellent suggestions made on the List for sourcing improvements!

Kirsten

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dick
Nixon
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:25 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Citing sources in Legacy


Yes!  Please keep this discussion going!  Legacy sourcing is a
constant topic in this list and a frustration for many users.

Legacy could make major improvements in this area and probably make
the cost back many fold in the marketplace.


Dick Nixon

On 10/3/06, Dennis L. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>        I'm new both to genealogy and Legacy but not to historical
> research.  Therefore, I applaud the statements Geoff Rasmussen makes
> about the importance of carefully citing sources in family-history
> research.  I'm frustrated in my attempts to use Legacy in doing
> that.  I understand that citing sources requires a conformity to a
> recognized standard of style and a consistency in adhering to that
> standard.  However, I'm on the verge of giving up unless someone can
> help.  Here is one of the problems.
>        Legacy seems to use the citation template for a book and to require
> that all kinds of sources be adapted, stuffed, or forced into that
> single author-title-publication template.  To enter a new source, I'm
> finding it necessary to work constantly with both the style manual
> (Mills) and the webpage "Tips" examples while entering data, and then
> I find the task is made more difficult because the little
> current-source window for entering detail data--which can be
> substantial, for example, in an Ancestry census cite--does not allow
> one to see but a portion of the entry without having to scan the
> cursor back and forth.  Already I've said too much, but maybe this
> suggests the kinds of problems I'm having with citations.
>        Do other templates exist and I've not found them?  Rather than
> forcing all kinds of sources into a book template, it would seem
> better to provide simple blank windows for citing primary, secondary,
> and bibliography data in appropriate styles.  And far better, to
> provide a list of the various types of sources used in genealogy
> research, followed by a descriptively labeled template appropriate to
> each type.  At least that is a method used for data entry by academic
> research softwares like Library Master and Endnote, and it remarkably
> improves accuracy and consistency in data entry.  This is what I'm
> having trouble gaining with Legacy.
>        Well, here goes--my frustration is sufficient that I'm finally
> willing to get my education in public.
>
>









Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

For online technical support, please visit 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to