Kevin, I agree completely. I can only comply with Mills sourcing (currently) by being a "splitter" to the max.
Janis -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin McMillan Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 12:59 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources and the elusive version 7 .... again. I was under the impression that use of the new Version 7 source templates would produce outputs that were arranged in the order that comply with Mills' newest book on citations Evidence Explained. Using the source citation system in version 6, I am currently unable to to get the elements to line up in the proper order. I have tried various methods of entering the sources without success. It is my desire to get source outputs that are as close to EE as possible. Due to this fact I am reluctant to input new data into Legacy if it means I will have to go back and redo my existing sources. That would mean the more I enter in Version 6, the more rework I would have to do in Version 7. I understand that sourcing in Legacy 6 currently produces outputs that are generally acceptable, but I want my database to have sources in it that are consistent and conform to EE standards. I guess what I am saying is I have been "chomping at the bit" in my wait for Version 7. It's release seems to have taken a lot longer than I was expecting it to. Fingers crossed that it is soon!!!!, Kevin Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
