Wayne:

I've grappled with this same issue for Acadian settlers in the 1600's all
the way through to Loyalist settlers in the 1700's and 1800's.  It's a real
pickle.  I tried the British North America identification (where
appropriate) and also found it cumbersome in reports so I've stopped.  I use
these instead (without the quotes):

To 1755:  "New France"
1755 - 25 Dec 1791:  "Quebec Province" for locations that are now in Quebec
but "X Township, X County, now Ontario, Canada" for my early Loyalist
settlers who were in the Niagara area from 1783.  I believe that showing the
location as "Niagara Township, Lincoln County, Quebec Province" (which it
was called) would be confusing.
26 Dec 1791 - 10 Feb 1841:  "Upper Canada" and "Lower Canada" (no Province)
11 Feb 1841 - 30 Jun 1867:  "Canada West" and "Canada East" (Province again
omitted)
>From there I go to the current official names.

This may curl the hair of some of our Canadian Legacy friends, and hopefully
they'll be gentle in their criticism/corrections.

Kirsten




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wayne
Martell
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 6:21 PM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: [LegacyUG] Pre-Confederation Quebec/Canadian Place Names


I am having some difficulty in deciding how to record place names for events
in Quebec that preceded Canadian Confederation.

Canada, as we now know it, came into existence on July 1, 1867. Starting on
February 10, 1841 until that date, what is now Quebec and Ontario was known
as the Province of Canada within British North America; Quebec was known as
Canada East and Ontario was known as Canada West but these were not official
names. From December 26, 1791 until 1841, Quebec was known as Lower Canada
and Ontario as Upper Canada, each a separate province within British North
America.

So far I have opted to use, for example, Quebec City, Canada East, Province
of Canada, British North America for the latter period and Quebec City,
Lower Canada, British North America for the former period. However, I am not
happy with these - they seem unnecessarily long and cumbersome.

Does anybody have a better idea? I would appreciate your input.

_______________________________
Wayne Martell
Victoria, BC, Canada







Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to