I agree with Jenny.
I have a Master Source for EACH individual I have corresponded with.
Of my 202 Master Sources, 80 are with individuals.  Several of those
individuals have 40 or more Source Detail records! (working on reports
for a family reunion).
Personally, I don't (think) I need more than the persons name (but am
open to other suggestions).
My Source Details include Emails, Phone conversations, and Personal
interviews, all under one Master Source per person.
If necessary, I would be willing to accept a different Master Source
for each type of conversation with each individual (but like having
them all together).
Thanks for your consideration.
Bruce

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Geoff Rasmussen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jenny,
>
> Let's talk about it then. Elizabeth Mills has certainly provided the
> researcher with flexibility to split or lump. What specific fields would you
> want to be included with the master source? After deciding that, we'd need
> to then come up with a simple, understandable source type name for the
> organizational hierarchy of the selections in step 1 of the SourceWriter.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Geoff Rasmussen
> Millennia Corporation
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenny M
> Benson
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 11:24 AM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: E-mail
>
>
> When using the SourceWriter to create a citation for an e-mail there are
> fields for entering the details of the sender, the recipient and the
> e-mail itself.   When you move to the Source Details screen, there are
> NO fields for Detail Information, other than Surety Level, Recorded Date
> and File ID.  This means that one must create a new Master Source for
> every single e-mail one wishes to record.
>
> NO!  NO!  NO!  that is taking splitting to the nth degree and I refuse!
>
> I've just checked out the template for Letters and I see that is the
> same.  I haven't looked at all the templates by any means yet, but I
> know that several of them have full Detail Information screens which
> allow for one Master Source and many Details so I can't imagine why the
> E-mail and Letter (and other?) templates are like this.
>
> I will definitely have to revert to Basic Source System for
> correspondence if we can't have the option to use SourceWriter in
> lumping fashion and that will be a real PITA.
> --
> Jenny M Benson
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to