I agree, but this a language problem, that will always be in the background. If they flame me, I will get over it. Rich in LA CA
--- On Sun, 7/19/09, ronald ferguson <[email protected]> wrote: > From: ronald ferguson <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Magically Appearing Unknown Spouses and Parents > To: [email protected] > Date: Sunday, July 19, 2009, 3:42 PM > > Rich, > > I suspect that Brian was meaning that even if the "blank" > option is selected the word "unknown" still appears on the > marriage screens. > > > > Ron Ferguson > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced > http://www.fergys.co.uk/ > View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: > http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ > For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: > http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ > _____________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:10:18 -0700 > > From: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Magically Appearing Unknown > Spouses and Parents > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Brian. I was describing the situation as: A single > Parent will have a 'space holder' with no RIN For the > 'missing spouse', and that can be hidden or show Unknown as > chosen. Or you can create that person with a RIN. > > You said 'Legacy has always added an "unknown" spouse > to a single parent whenever you link that person to a child. > This goes back as far as Legacy 2.0'. wrong. It has never > been, and still is, optional. > > Rich in LA CA > > > > --- On Sun, 7/19/09, Ruth Nerud wrote: > > > >> From: Ruth Nerud > >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Magically Appearing > Unknown Spouses and Parents > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Sunday, July 19, 2009, 6:32 AM > >> That's not good. It takes two to make > >> a baby, but an unmarried woman who has a baby does > not have > >> a spouse. I tried Charlotte's suggestion of > working with the > >> marriage list and it did remove the Unknown > spouse, but it > >> also unlinked her child. > >> > >> Ruth A. (Sconza Testa) Nerud > >> [email protected] > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian/Support" > > >> To: > >> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 7:58 AM > >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Magically Appearing > Unknown Spouses > >> and Parents > >> > >> > >>> Legacy has always added an "unknown" spouse to > a > >> single parent whenever you link that person to a > child. This > >> goes back as far as Legacy 2.0 > >>> > >>> Brian > >>> Customer Support > >>> Millennia Corporation > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com > >> > _________________________________________________________________ > Share your memories online with anyone you want. > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/ > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
