Kirsten, With respect, that is a lot different. I can understand a reluctance to *Upgrade* to a new version where complete new sections of code, or functionality, have been added eg. in V7 there was Mapping, Source Writer, integrated Charting etc. An *Update* is quite different and involves the correction of coding bugs present in the current version, and maybe the improvement in the way in which a function operates. Rarely does this introduce other problems.
Ron Ferguson _____________________________________________________________________ Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced http://www.fergys.co.uk/ View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _____________________________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- > From: vik...@rvi.net > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Adoption Question > Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 17:07:24 -0700 > > Gary: > > Sounds very sensible, but I waited two months before upgrading to 7.0 and > then suffered through endless months of headaches with a totally useless (to > me) program because of the source citation bugs and inability to produce any > satisfactory reports. I'm not chancing that again. Call me chicken . > > Kirsten > > -----Original Message----- > From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on > Behalf Of Gary Templeman > Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 4:01 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Adoption Question > > > However, it was released July 17 and in three weeks there have not been > reports on this list of major new problems so I would not call it premature > to update now. When there are a lot of users it usually doesn't take long > for big issues to raise their head so after a week or two you should feel > pretty confident. Besides, these updates typically contain both new features > AND important bug fixes, so the benefits almost always outweigh the risks. > > Gary Templeman > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kirsten Bowman" > To: > Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 2:03 PM > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Adoption Question > > >> Sorry, Ron, but I've been snookered into premature updates before. Once >> burned, twice shy. >> >> Checks are in place as you recommended. Thanks. >> >> Kirsten >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on >> Behalf Of ronald ferguson >> Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 12:20 PM >> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com >> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Adoption Question >> >> >> >> Kirsten, >> >> Although not relevant to your problem I would suggest that you update to >> 7.0.0.100. >> >> On Descendant Book Report>Report Options>Include, ensure that child status >> and Child-parent relationship are checked. >> >> >> >> Ron Ferguson _________________________________________________________________ Upgrade to Internet Explorer 8 Optimised for MSN. http://extras.uk.msn.com/internet-explorer-8/?ocid=T010MSN07A0716U Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
