Her responses always give the impression that at some point in time a re-write 
will happen.  I am asking that Millennia be honest with their customer for a 
change and give us an honest answer as to whether or not this re-write is or is 
not going to happen.  In other words, stop making excuses and tell us if there 
is a possibility that these requested items will or will not be a reality.  My 
question stands.  Is this re-write that she keeps leaning on ever going to 
happen? 

Ron Bernier
Woonsocket, RI


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

Ron,

 

Where are you reading into her response ANYTHING to indicate such a re-write 
was either promised or in progress? She is simply stating the fact that the 
current structure will not accept such a change. Any re-write has to make 
economic sense for the company. And there needs to be enough benefits beyond a 
single feature that it is worth while putting the third-party developers 
through a re-write of their programs too.

 

Gary

 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Bernier" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 10:17:44 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

Sherry,
Is this database re-write ever going to happen?  We have been hearing this same 
response for at least three years now.  I think Millennia needs to be honest 
with their users.  Either this re-write is going to happen or it isn't.  This 
excuse has ceased to be believable.

---
Ron Bernier, sent from my Verizon Blackberry Storm

----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon Aug 10 12:52:59 2009
Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

It's not a matter that we're *not* going to do it - it's a matter that the
way Legacy is structured we *can't* do it at this time without a complete
rewrite of the database structure.  Of course, that would have a
trickle-down effect for the developers of the add-on programs and they'd
have to rewrite their programs to accept the new Legacy format.

It's not as simple as flipping a switch or anything. It would be a major
undertaking.

Believe me, we have enough people writing to us that they'd like this
feature so we know it's a popular request and it hasn't fallen from the
radar!

Thanks for using Legacy.

Sherry
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
[email protected]
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com

We are changing the world of genealogy!

When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence.
Thanks.



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

-�s%,z����`�'^�)޲m����ށ�2���$�y�(��-����ך��+r�yٞ�Ơz�m����
&j)Z��b��(��^��2�ǫ��.�W�i̟jh����y�&����w�y�g�ƥ��i��a���
0-�s!Z�)rN��r���ij�S��칻�&ކ�i��0���i̅jh��:�y�&���i̋��lj�

Reply via email to