Think seriously before moving Street addresses from Location. . It is pointless doing all that work unless you get value from your time and effort. So Test the Reports, try re-sorting the Master Location List - is the output meaningful and helping you advance your research? Will you get better results from "Location" or "Address"? Everyone has their own slant, depending on their needs and the character of their Family File. I have never used the fields for "Address", can't see the point! I like everything in the one List. It is worth reiterating, the "Four Field Standard" was developed for USA Locations and even there, it is a poor fit. But Legacy is infinitely flexible, and allows 9 ( nine ) fields in Locations. So my Locations include what's in the records, down to the street and exact house number, sometimes 6 or 7 fields. When I "Sort" or reverse the List, I can see everyone who lived in that street and the house they occupied. Currently, I have 278 Trees in my Family File. Many of these people will be duplicated and/or related, not yet proved. Seeing where they lived - and who were the neighbours - can throw up clues. Mary Young
Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
