I often use and save the digital images from "Missouri Marriage Records,
1805-2002," at Ancestry.com and like Connie, I find the images problematic
for the reasons she stated. I use other sources to find the book number and
only look at the transcriptions to see how Ancestry has  dealt with the
sometimes difficult handwriting.

But this isn't about Ancestry.com; it's about how to source the material
from Ancestry.com. I use SourceWriter template for Marriage records > Found
in governmental records > Marriage registers > Created at the county level >
Online images

Here is how I fill in the fields for the master source:
Source List Name: Marriage Records - Missouri 1805 - 2002
Jurisdiction State:  Missouri
Jurisdiction County: [I leave this blank because I don't want 114 Master
Sources for Missouri's 114 counties!]
Series: Missouri Marriage Records, 1805 - 2002
Format:  Digital images
Website Creator:  Ancestry.com
Website Title:  [I leave this blank as it seems redundant to repeat
"Ancestry.com" or "Missouri Marriage Records, 1805-2002"]
URL:  http://www.ancestry.com
Date:  2007

In the Source Detail fields I put:
Item Type:  marriage register
Volume: Stoddard County Book 1 [I know it is book 1 from other sources]
Page:  251
Person 1 Surname:  Crews
Person 2 Surname:  Saddler
Year:  1876
Date Accessed: 4 Jul 2008

Under the Text/Comments tab, I transcribe the marriage record in the top
section and enter comments about the source in the bottom section.

Here is the end result:

Footnote/Endnote Citation:
Missouri, Missouri Marriage Records, 1805 - 2002, Stoddard County Book 1:
251, Crews-Saddler, 1876; digital images, Ancestry.com
(http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 4 Jul 2008).

Subsequent Citation:
Missouri, marriage register, Stoddard County Book 1: 251, Crews-Saddler,
1876.

Bibliography:
Missouri. Missouri Marriage Records, 1805 - 2002. Digital images.
Ancestry.com http://www.ancestry.com : 2007.

Sherry



----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirsten Bowman" <vik...@rvi.net>
To: <LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 12:37 PM
Subject: [BULK] RE: [LegacyUG] Advice on Sourcing of marriage record


Jenny:

I'd also use the SourceWriter Marriage template that you mentioned, but I
see a nice feature about Connie's format in that it treats the title of the
record set as the lead element whereas the SourceWriter template doesn't.
The second example is part of a similar citation generated by SourceWriter.

"Missouri Marriage Records, 1805-2002," database, Ancestry.com
(www.ancestry.com : accessed 22 Aug 2009)

Bell County, Kentucky, Kentucky Marriage Records, 1852-1914; digital images,
Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com);

Kirsten



-----Original Message-----
From: Jenny M Benson [mailto:ge...@cedarbank.me.uk]
Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 9:10 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Advice on Sourcing of marriage record



Connie Sheets wrote:
> [My apologies that this won't thread properly, but I'm still having to
> read the list in the archives].
>
> The Missouri Marriage Record images at Ancestry are problematic, IMO,
> because Ancestry has not given enough information as to what we are
> looking at.  Yes, they are apparently using State Archives microfilm
> (they don't tell us which microfilm), but it is microfilm of record books
> maintained at the county, and they don't tell us which record book.Â
> Sometimes, it is possible by browsing through the images to figure it out,
> and when it is, I include that.  I ended up citing the database, not the
> images per se, because it is such a mess.  I used the generic online
> database template.
>
I am curious as to why you are using a database template when your Source
is online images.

I don't have access to the Ancestry records to which you refer, but I
think I would use the Marriage records>Found in Governmental
records>Marriage registers>Created at State/Provincial level/Online images
template (or something similar if that isn't an exact match) and add the
further detail - where known - at Soiurce Detail level.

This is how I approach very similar English records with images on
Ancestry.  Where the Source details are incomplete (or incorrect, as
sometimes happens with Ancestry!) I note this in the Source Detail
Comments.

--
Jenny M Benson




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to