Not only did the indiviual not sign the email, but he/she also lacked the common courtesy to identify himself/herself as the sender of the email. Notice that the From merely had _. Obviously an individual with nil credibility. Ron Bernier Sent from my Verizon BlackBerry
________________________________ From: Ruth Nerud To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Tue May 04 07:28:05 2010 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Converting Source Citations Maybe I am just old fashioned; but - why didn't you sign your name at the end of your e-mail. That's a common courtesy everyone should follow. Ruth Nerud ----- Original Message ----- From: _<mailto:wba...@yahoo.com> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 5:46 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Converting Source Citations Maybe I am just old fashioned; but why can't someone just ask a simple question and get a simple answer without being chided for not perusing over an innumerable amount of archived messages that will not guarantee that he will find an answer? He already consulted the manual before posting a question and found that it contained erroneous information. How can anyone be sure that the information in archived messages is up to date? I have a job that involves training students and also entry level employees to my profession. If you want to put yourself in the position of helping people learn something, then be prepared to be asked the same questions by various people who have less experience then you and who just want to learn. This is a support forum! Next time someone gets lost while driving, and needs to stop somewhere and ask directions, try lurking for awhile to get the feel of it. --- On Sun, 5/2/10, Jenny M Benson <ge...@cedarbank.me.uk> wrote: From: Jenny M Benson <ge...@cedarbank.me.uk> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Converting Source Citations To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Date: Sunday, May 2, 2010, 3:57 PM RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote >This has been out there since before/when 7.0 came out, but as newbies >come in, they don't (needn't) search the Archives to find old unsolved >problems, so this surfaces again every few months. I suppose I'm old-fashioned, but I remember a time when it was considered common politeness both to read the archives of a group and "lurk" for a while to get the "feel" of it. -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp <http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp> Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp <http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp> Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
