Connie Sheets wrote >That doesn't bother me one bit (well, writing those two names in the >same sentence does, but I digress), and is the method I use for >websites like Ancestry.com or FamilySearchLabs (to which I consider >Facebook analogous in that they are humongous sites with vast amounts >of data that require splitting into smaller parts for purposes of >citation).
I don't use Facebook at all, but as far as I know it is quite *un*like Ancestry in that it does not supply a set of various different databases. I never use "Ancestry" as a Source - I use the particular database within Ancestry. Family Search Labs doesn't present its data in quite the same separated way, but again I use a separate Master Source for each set of data. I think that I am neither an extreme lumper nor an extreme splitter. -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
