Paula, That is a good approach and quite effective; in my local genealogy
classes I emphasize that it is not so important how you document, but
that you do and the important thing is for someone else to find the
source and citation, using your notes.  I may not previously mention, but
I am the "family historian" for a 300 member family association and we
are working on a hundred year of family register update. There is a lot
of information exchange and the least effort that allows someone else
finding the source citation is what is sought.  Very little text is keep
in the notes section as it is hard, for me at least, to remember, what I
said about whom.  Sometimes there are frustration, but in the end a lot
of fun.    Leonard



On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:35:20 -0800 (PST) Paula Ryburn
<paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net> writes:
Leonard, If I am reading you correctly, I don't go so far as to indicate
in the census detail citation which piece(s) of information are
supported.  I mean, I attach the detail citation to the pieces / fields
that are supported, but I am not trying to print that out.  I have the
little source citation number next to the field in the report (I'm mostly
using FGR these days) and the detail census citation on the source page
at the end.  For example, for a new sibling of one of my direct line
ancestors, I would typically cite the census on the name and birth
date/place fields, plus I would add a census event (I write all the other
info in a narrative fashion in the Notes:  "She was 12 years old, and
attended school that year.").  I typically have other/more citations on
the name and birth date/place for those in my direct line, so the census
may have just been the starting point for the year and state.
Definitely, the new siblings would have a date range based on the age and
the census date (except 1900 where the month & year of birth are given)
and a state.  I may or may not pursue more information on the siblings.


Wow, got a bit wordy!


Oh, if I were running a book report (ancestor, descendent), the citations
do include the head of household, so that keeps them separate... not all
lumped into one "US 1900 Illinois Cook Co." citation, for example.  (I
don't lump further than county.)

--Paula in Texas
Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton
Chapman Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis
Exline Field Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind
Hopkins Hughes Hurdle Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner
Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan
Weller Williams
____________________________________________________________
Banks Forced to Forgive Credit Card Debt
See how much of your debt could be settled!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4f3d1d4fb720613001a5st02vuc

Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to