Marg,

The Y-DNA is only passed down through the male line, so the answer to you 
question is a (slightly qualified) yes.

As this is off-topic for this list I am sending you direct a pdf giving basic 
details of the types of DNA tests and what they are for.

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

From: Marg Strong
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 10:26 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What are Islands in the family tree? DNA question

So on my mother's side, with no living male relative in her generation, we are 
out of luck? She has a nephew but I wouldn't know him to see him, let alone ask 
for a DNA test.



Is there a good link with an easy to understand explanation for DNA testing for 
genealogy purposes?


Thanks for the reply!




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: Ron Ferguson <ronfergy....@tiscali.co.uk>
  To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
  Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 4:40 PM
  Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What are Islands in the family tree? DNA question


  Marg,

  An Island is formed by having at least one individual who is not linked in 
any way to someone in your main tree. If there are, say, three people linked 
together but not linked to the main tree then you have one Island of 3 people.

  DNA is far from that simple. However, if you are thinking only of tracing 
your father’s line back through his main line then you need to have your 
brother test for his Y-DNA, and as you say, he is your last chance.

  Ron Ferguson
  http://www.fergys.co.uk/


  From: Marg Strong
  Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 8:31 PM
  To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
  Subject: [LegacyUG] What are Islands in the family tree? DNA question

  I think from reading the topic about adding possible ancestors/descendants, 
that some keep a separate database or family file for possible relations; 
others keep those individuals in "islands"  How do you create islands in your 
main database?


  Also, if anyone knows off hand, with DNA testing, I believe it has to be a 
male in the line. I have one brother left in my line. I don't even know any 
male cousins and no uncles are still alive. I have no sons, but two grandsons. 
So is my brother our last chance?



  Thanks




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: Linda Hauley <lhau...@rogers.com>
    To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
    Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 1:19 PM
    Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed 
links?


    For Tami & Michelle:

    If you are doing a One-Name Study as I am, I have one ‘family tree’ where I 
enter all instances of the surname or variant and cite the source so that when 
I get queries I can point that person in the right direction.  I keep my own 
family tree and only those that I have a positive link to in it.  If I happen 
to find a connection in my One-Name Study tree, I transfer what is relevant 
through a Gedcom.  That way if you do come across other instances that don’t 
link now, keeping them this way, you might be able to connect them at some 
point.

    For David:

    DNA testing is an absolute science – it’s how you interpret the results 
that gets you your connections.  Even if you don’t get a link, a person within 
a 3rd to 5th cousin range could be linked, but you have to have patience.  I 
had my Dad tested for YDNA and Family Finder (he has now passed on but they 
still retain his samples) and I have tested for the Full mtDNA Sequence.  
Recently, reviewing my Dad’s results through his mtDNA, I found a person with a 
variant surname to his that was within the 3rd to 5th cousin range.  We are 
currently searching documents for the possible connection.  It’s a challenge 
but in research whether genealogy or DNA, it’s the chase that is so fulfilling!!

    Linda J. Hauley
    Recycled Memories Family History Research
    GOONS Canada East Regional Representative
    VODDEN One Name Study
    Member #4335
    CANADA


    From: David C Abernathy [mailto:da...@schmeckabernathy.com]
    Sent: March 24, 2012 11:22 AM
    To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
    Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed 
links?

    NO, This is where DNA really pays off. There are several very large 
researched surname groups out there that I would like to find a proven 
connection.  BUT, with having done DNA testing, I have found that there is no 
way I will be connected to some of these groups. So it is a waste of my time to 
continue in researching in those directions.

    Why would anyone want to carry around all of these nonrelated entries 
within their database?

    If there is a chance of connection, I make a separate database not an 
island within my main one, and do some tracking from these external families. I 
have found very few ever get connected, so all I have to do is delete the file, 
to be rid if the non connecting people.

    Thanks,
    David C Abernathy
    Email disclaimers
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This message represents the official view of the voices in my head.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.schmeckabernathy.com/
    == All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus  ==

    From: Michele Lewis [mailto:ancestor...@gmail.com]
    Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 4:47 AM
    To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
    Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed 
links?

    Oh, one more thing…
    The less common the surname, the more likely I will add them since there is 
a higher chance they are connected.

    michele

    From: Tami P. [mailto:tamitr...@comcast.net]
    Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 12:31 AM
    To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
    Subject: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed 
links?

    I’ve been working on my database for awhile now and have a question. How do 
you all decide to add to your databases? Do you add anyone with the surname 
your are searching or only those people with a confirmed link? Until now I’ve 
only been adding only those that I can confirm a link. However, lately I’m 
wondering if I’m overlooking a lot of potential links because they may be 
several generations previous to the one I’m currently searching. Just wondering 
how you all feel about this too. Thanks!








Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to