Marg, Actually, I prefer it that way. Imagine how difficult it would be to find records if they were all listed on Ancestry.com under the jurisdiction when the event took place. Some of my places are listed 4 or 5 different ways in my location list because of how they were known through the years.
This is just another good reason why we need to study the history too. Mary ---- Marg Strong <tiny...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Well that would make it more difficult. Shame on them. > >________________________________ > > From: M. Brenzel <brenze...@roadrunner.com> > >To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > >Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 7:51 PM > >Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Entering Canadian Locations - Changing boundaries? > > > > > >I believe that Ancestry.com uses locations as they are in the present. > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
