On 11/09/2012 17:09, Ron Ferguson wrote:
> I do not not disagree with you in absolute terms, but I do put (Ancestry,
> Findmypast etc.) in the repository. But I also make it clear where the
> actual documents may be viewed. My reason for this is that there may by a
> transcription error in Ancestry etc. which I have recorded as written;
> without knowing where I saw the reference it may prove harder to trace.

In the case of records for which only a transcription is available to me
I would do as you do, but where there is an original image I record what
*I* see.

Very often I agree that the transcription accurately reflects what is in
the image, even though I know the image is wrong - as often happens with
a Census where we are looking at what is already a transcription of an
original (in the case of UK Censuses, anyway.)  Sometimes it easier for
me to read what was actually written than it is for a transcriber who
may be working at speed in an alien language, because I know what I am
looking for.

As I record the full reference in my Citationss people can always find
what I looked at (if it's still available somewhere) and make up their
own minds.
--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to