Ron - Designating someone as a candidate for a relationship is common practice in gen research - and having the ability to include that info in the software in a standardized format can be helpful to the serious genealogist. Where I have seen that option in gen software, there is little chance of confusion or misunderstanding.
Depending upon the level of user interest of course, certainly a valid suggestion. Virginia On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Ron Ferguson <ronfergy....@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > I thought that I had made it clear that my reservation was to changes being > made to Legacy which may encourage others, less careful than yourself, to > create “possible” links which may over time, and perhaps after transcription > by others, become “facts”. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
