Will somebody please put a stop to this? (I hope everything is spelled correctly)
Bobby From: Pat Hickin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2013 9:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] marriages Ron Taylor wrote: "The point of the marriage record box is to state that no offspring resulted from the union." It seems to me that the point of the marriage record box (in the individual window) should be to say that the person was never married. The whole matter of whether there were children is and should be a separate issue. The point I am trying to make is that I object to saying there were no children when it is almost impossible to know for certain that an individual --a man especially --had no children. People are not addressing this point but are talking about other issues which are not my main concern. Pat Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
