Jay I wrote my first program in 1967 and was a professional programmer and database designer from 1972 until I retired in 2004. I have designed and implemented databases far more complex than that used by Legacy - which is in no way meant to belittle the Legacy programmers. No database should be any more complex than necessary.
If I (or my team) ever implemented something which did not reflect the reality of the situation we were emulating, then we would consider it a bug. All Pat and I want is for the statement "This person did not marry and had no children" to be split into two halves, and for the "did not marry" half to be available when there is a relationship record created in Legacy. If anyone has no use for that, then fine - don't use it. I have no use for LDS ordinances, so I make no comment about them. If a person did not marry, then that is something which should be recorded at the individual level. It is a little strange to suggest that the fact that someone did not marry should be recorded in a marriage record. Yes, I have entered this as a suggestion through proper channels. Tony Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
