Dennis – I’ve re-titled your last post so that others can use the subject – perhaps to give you some help on your problem. (those interested in Peter Astle’s quite different problem may be a little confused)
I wonder if your problems are due to the size of your database, including images etc? Perhaps Cathy Pinner can recall if other users of Legacy have had as much data as you, without having this error? Regards, Ian Thomas Albert Park, Victoria 3206 Australia From: LegacyUserGroup [mailto:legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com] On Behalf Of Dennis Murphy Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2018 4:11 AM To: Legacy User Group <legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living/Deceased Status of Mothers with children where no Father details are entered Error 3021 This is not the first fight with this Error Number but it's the first one on which all the Help menu suggestions fail to solve. The final resort and ultimate "import to Gedcom" has not and likely, will not, be attempted due to it's source alterations. I have run the Check & Repair multiple times, even twice in one complete Maintenance session. I have rebooted computer, tried again. Not sure if reinstalling the Legacy program will work but that may be next. The error message reads" Location 19152 not found (1009, 81) Error 3021" It pops up every time I try to export a portion of my large database to smaller Legacy family files. Running File Maintenance on the master or larger database produces no errors; it only happens on the attempted extraction of portions of the larger file - at least that's when I notice it always. My questions: Does "Location 19152" refer to a specific geographical location? How or where can it be found? Do the numbers in parentheses refer to individual ID numbers where the location is missing? I have the latest Legacy build but hope for a new update soon to see if that will fix the problem. There seems to be a lot of glitches still floating around in Version 9 as these error messages pop up quite often. Usually they can be fixed by following the suggestions but these LOCATION ones seem to be a bear on the loose. Please help: I am open to any and all suggestions On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Cathy Pinner <genea...@gmail.com<mailto:genea...@gmail.com>> wrote: Peter, I've been doing some testing on this and you appear to be right. I can't see it entered as a bug so I've entered it (I'm a beta tester) and noted you as the reporter. They're not options I've used for a long time. I don't make Gedcoms often and lately just for DNA purposes so everyone except me in it is deceased and I've mostly just edited out my details. Cathy Peter Astle via LegacyUserGroup wrote: This is my first message to the user group - so apologies if this query has been aired before. In my database I have a number of females who were living in the mid-late 1800's, and their living status is set to NO. In the process of exporting the family file via a Gedcom to view on a website, I used the privacy options within Legacy to suppress the details of living individuals as follows:- /Suppress details for deceased spouses of living individuals, change name to deceased./ / / /and/ / / /Suppress details for deceased children of living individuals, change name to deceased./ After uploading the Gedcom to the website I reviewed the family file details that were displayed and I was surprised to see the following pattern. In most cases, the names and other details of females who were born in the 1800s and whose living status is NO would be displayed as normal. However, if the female had a child, but the relevant father details had not been entered, the mother appears as "Deceased" and her actual name and other details are suppressed. The name and details of her /"illegitimate"/ child are not suppressed however and appear in full. It looks rather odd to have an individual's details suppressed and their name replaced by "deceased" when they died well before 1900. It appears that Legacy has made this decision for me - as the mothers concerned are not the spouses of a living individual as under the suppressing option I selected above. I can understand the need to protect the privacy of people where apparent and actual illegitimacy is concerned, but if that is the intention/design of Legacy, should the child's name and details be suppressed too? I realise as a relatively new user of Legacy I may have misunderstood, or overlooked a setting option or a work around for this, so I'd be grateful for views/advice. I was considering entering some details for the "unknown" fathers, perhaps that would solve the issue, but I don't think entering people as name "unknown" is good practice - is it?? Thanks Peter -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com> To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
-- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/