Hi Geoff, Ken & others,

Geoff wrote:
>The entire Legacy's Ultimate Guide to Sources CD is devoted to teaching
>about sources.  An upcoming CD will teach methodologies, principles, and
>data entry guidelines for census records, city directories, pension
>records, and much more.

The posting about Legacy and Sources made me wonder what the status
of the Merge/Source/Bug/Feature was?

There was a number of posts about the issue but it has not been listed
under the usual list of fixed items these last few months.

>I like the idea of a source tab also, it would be a nice feature.
>It's been added to our list of things to work on.
>Thanks
>Ken McGinnis
>
>From: "Cal Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 6:29 PM
>Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merge/source/corruption bug
> I agree Ken.    re: Fixes
>
> Controlling ALL the sources attached to specific event items in the
> data is very important, especially during a merge.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken McGinnis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 5:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merge/source/corruption bug
>
> | Fixes:
> | ================
> | I can add a new option to save a few keystrokes. My proposed change
> | is to add another menu item to the Options button on the bottom of
> | the merge screen that would read something like "Don't combine sources
> | for unselected| information".
>
>From: Barry Kruger
>Subject: [LegacyUG] Merge/source/corruption bug
>Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 04:27:46 -0700
>Hi,
>
>I downloaded the latest update to my Legacy 4.0 Deluxe and
>the merge/source/corruption bug is still there.
>
>Others have confirmed the problem as well (Steve Addison).
>
>Regards
>Barry
>
>From: "Steve Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources incorrect on merging
>Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 23:41:55 +0100
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Whilst doing a bit of merging this evening it has become
>apparent that Legacy is not handling the sources correctly
>when merging takes place. For instance, if two pieces of
>data are different and with different sources, say birth
>data, if you just ignore the incoming data and keep your own,
>Legacy still assigns the incoming source to your own data,
>thereby corrupting the sources by adding a source to your
>own data which is incorrect and not for that data.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:27 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup
> Subject: Sources incorrect on merging
> Hi Ken,
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Ken McGinnis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:44 AM
> >Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources incorrect on merging
> >
>
> This source issue is definitely not a family file issue. It is easy to
> reproduce this problem in any file. Create two new individuals. Give one
> a birth date with no source. Give the other a birth date source but do not
> enter a birth date. Merge them. Now watch as the source has
> jumped to the birth date and now has suddenly become the source for
> the date to which it was never attached or intended.
>
> Regards
> Barry

Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/

To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to