"1950's" and similar will sort correctly. So will "Late 1950's", based on "1950". You can also use Abt 1957, or you could use "1955 to 1960" (or Betw 1955 and 1960). All will sort correctly, based on the first year-like number found. legacy doesn't know what Early and Late mean, but will preserve the manually set sequence in the Chronology report. There's a lot of flexibility there.

You can't use worded dates "nineteen-fifty" and have them sort correctly, however. (Some of the above examples will fail the Potential Problems Report, and will need to be manually excluded, but that's another story!).

Rob

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Christie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Advice on events



Bob Janetzko wrote:
I also used Occupation events extensively for a long time. Most of them
came from census information. Even though the residence on a Census event
applied to a specific date only, the occupation likely spanned many years,
so when I entered those Occupation events, I didn't specify a date.
This left those Occupation events subject to accidentally getting resorted.

Over the last couple of days I've been experimenting with the events for occupation and residence for a family member I have a lot of data for. It seems to work OK, and I rather like the little chart you get on the left on the Individual Report. However, not all the dates sort properly. This is not too surprising because some of them are entered in non-standard ways. However, it would be darn nice if Legacy could figure out some of these and sort them correctly -- they're not impossible, just complicated.


Here are the dates from the events I entered, in the order they sort into:

from summer 1960 to December 1961
in the late nineteen-fifties
in the early nineteen-fifties
from her birth in 1919 until she went to university
from 1962 to 1965
from 1962 to early 1965
from 1965 to 1979
from 1965 to her death in 1981

I suspect the first four are sorted randomly and the last for are sorted on at least the first year found, which is quite reasonable. Is it unreasonable to hope that Legacy would one day be able to sort this list by date? It would be OK if I had to say "1950s" or "1950's" instead of "nineteen-fifties", if that would help. Even just picking out the first year in the text would be a pretty good way to go.

Mike
--
Athens Group
Experience. Technology. Results.
-----------------------------------------------
Mike Christie
Athens Group Inc.
4201 Southwest Freeway, Suite 220
Houston, TX 77027
Voice: 713.960.5094, ext. 112
Cell: 713.504.6455
Fax: 713.960.5061
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.athensgroup.com
Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/

To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/

To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to