I understand the rationale of "internationalizing" Legacy; the company has to grow its customer base and is wise to do so. However, that effort has created an unintentional side effect, namely, the invisible hot spots by which one can unknowingly change an attribute.
It is true that various Windows applications have labels as part of the hot spot. However, I suspect those label hot spots tend to be limited to the visible label field. The problem Legacy now has is that those label hot spots can be larger that the visible label. It appears the programmers have to decided to maximize the label hot spot, visible or not, to accomodate how various languages spell a word such as "private." And, therein lies the problem. I would suggest that if it is necessary to have a standard field length for a label that is larger that the visible, character length of the label, then the label should not be a hot spot. The label field and the check box/radio button should be separate fields with only the latter a hot spot. Jon Raymond St. Paul Park, MN http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~raymond Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
