Yes, that is another real possibility.
Gordon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Beverley Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] e: Keeping track of adopted names
Mother was probably sent "to visit aunt Nellie" or to "finishing school" for several months and nothing mentioned at home about a pregnancy. Child would then have been registered under the name the mother was using with no mention of the father.<SNIP>
((*-*)) Bev Adelaide, South Australia
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gordon Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] e: Keeping track of adopted names
The adoption would have probably taken place after the marriage... The era is circa 1933-1935. The oldest child was born in Pittsburgh, PA. I have a
Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
