regarding:
> 1) a simpler way of identifying which of the IGIs actually have primary > sources, and the details of those that do not. I believe that currently the > only "source" identified is the generic "International Genealogical Index > (R) v5" (Am I wrong on this?) In sourcing one aims to specify enough detail > so that future researchers can go back and easily review the actual sources > for verification of relevance and accuracy. Clifford: Legacy includes a source detail entry when the IGI provides this information such as: citing microfilm 0934307 for batch 7400716, sheet 55, downloaded 21 Feb 2005 citing microfilm 446356, reference number 92186, downloaded 21 Feb 2005 citing microfilm 537323, downloaded 21 Feb 2005 citing microfilm 538026, downloaded 21 Feb 2005 If the IGI doesn't have detail source information, then only the master source entry you mentioned is used. You're right that there is no way to review this source detail information while on the IGI possible matches screen except by using the '@' button match-by-match. I would like to see a sources tab on the side by side comparison (or some other way to review the sources before merging into my file). Jeremy Main -- Bethesda, Md Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
