I don't think I have ever joined a string of people expressing views on this list. However, this time I felt it would be good for Millennia Corporation to know how many people focus on how legacy handles data and for me particularly the Register report.
The Geo database is nice and I have used it a few times but there are other sources to locate places. The IGI is available several other ways and I have used it over the years. I will always prefer to do my own IGI search away from my Legacy program. I can't think of an easier way to corrupt a data base than to download a bunch of IGI info without checking it out. IMO There isn't an easier way to do a Register Report than having a computer program do it for you and Legacy. Legacy has stayed up with software like Microsoft Xp etc a very important move, thank you. This type of updating is critical as is the way the legacy handles names and reports. Please like so many before me have stated don't lose track of the report process of data collection. Without a good stable report system the data is less valuable. Karen V. Sipe > >> >From: "John R. Bayle" > >> >I'm more concerned that whatever the software does, > >> >it does completely and well. So to me, improving and > >> >expanding the way Legacy handles names is more > >> >important than IGI searches, and Geo databases etc. Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
