Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships problem - reported not fixed

[ralarson]

26 March build - the specific problem I have with the 
relationship calculator:  My great-grandfather had a 1/2 
brother - the mother of this half-brother is not known at 
this point, so by *my* standards I do not enter her.  If I 
place this half-great-granduncle on the left in the Rel. 
Calc., and myself on the right, the relationship is correct 
(half-great-granduncle) and shows my great-great-grandfather 
as the common ancestor.  If I swap the two individuals, the 
relationship shown is that of 1st cousin 3 times removed, 
and the common ancestor(s) are my 
great-great-great-grandparents.  Certainly the calculator 
should give the same descent path and common ancestors in 
both cases.

	Note: this is *not* the exact same problem as reported by 
E. Rodier.  This is *not* a result of something bad in my 
data.  This is *not* an invitation to discuss (again) 
whether I should enter underscores or "unknown" or something 
else for the mother's name - I choose not to do so and the 
calculator should work anyway.

	This half-great-granduncle, *and* his descendants, also do 
not get *any* relationship set to me with the "set 
relationships" tool.
				Ruth Ann

E.Rodier wrote:
Relationship problem shows in the March 26 build (online update) of 
Legacy 5 using Asa Brown's family with a made-up second spouse. Deleted 
USR files and ran File Maintenance several times, restarted Legacy 5. 
Using WinXP Pro with online updates.

Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp