On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:18:29 +0100, "Peter Chalmers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For example, I can make the England 1871 Census a Master Source, and then >add Census events to each individual with the page reference info, >transcription etc. in the event detail. Or I can make each page reference a >Master Source, with maybe a complete transcription there, and then add a >Census event with just a reference to that Master Source. Of course, the >second way will mean I get a large number of Master Source entries. The >first way seems tidier, but makes a bit of extra work for me when adding >sources. How do other people deal with this? Is there a better way >altogether? There are people on this list who swear by each method (and probably a few others). Since eventually you will want to produce reports, I would try both and then produce a report or two to see how each looks. Then choose what you like. Also check out... http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Tips.asp Enjoy! -- Dennis M. Kowallek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ****************** Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
