Jeremy,

That makes all kinds of sense. Thank you!

In theory, then, I should be able to "clean up" my database by
re-importing an identical copy, telling it to preserve the imported
version. Once I get a clean pass, I should be back in business (albeit
tab-free).

  Ed

On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 16:32, Jeremy Main wrote:
> Hi Ed:
>    I believe the problem you are seeing is happening as part of the import 
> and is not an Intellishare/IntelliMerge issue, per se.
> 
>    I've been looking at RIN # 1793 (Benjamin Robertson III) in your original 
> database.  I imported a copy into itself and got the 89 individuals it says 
> it was 'not able to merge'
> 
>    What I've found so far is that the General Notes of both the original and 
> the copy contains 112 lines.  However, the original has 5,321 characters and 
> the copy has 5,345.   So,  there IS a difference after import which 
> IntellPass Merge is detecting.
> 
>    However, the difference is that the original has 132 tabs versus 120 in 
> the copy/import (12 fewer in the copy).  And the original has 847 spaces 
> versus 883 in the copy/import (36 more in the copy).  For a net difference of 
> 24 characters.   (5,345 - 5,321 = 24 ).
> 
>    So.......
> 1)  The import is changing SOME of the Tab characters to spaces,  and
> 2)  IntelliPass Merge is considering these tab/space differences significant.
> 
> I don't think you have a corrupt file.  Only that the import is making some 
> unexpected changes.  I'll look a littler further and tell you exactly which 
> lines are the ones being changed.  Wm's utilitiy, UltraEdit, is probably not 
> considering these differences to be significant.  A visual scan can see no 
> difference.
> 
> .../Jeremy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Barnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sep 11, 2005 5:06 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Intellishare fails on 6.0 and V5-latest.
> 
> Ron, Henry, Wm,
> 
> Thanks for the suggestions!
> 
> I've been investigating myself, as well. It now appears to me that I
> have a corrupted database, as someone suggested. The corruption dates
> back to prior to the conversion to the new format, but didn't manifest
> itself until after the conversion.
> 
> Here's what I've tried. (Hopefully Sherry will see this!)
> 
> I went back to a July backup, ~4000 names, same problem. That is, I
> restored from backup, converted to new format, closed, made a copy,
> merged the two copies, got spurious differences in the notes.
> 
> Same with a May backup of ~450 names.
> 
> Early May backup of ~150 names didn't fail; nor did a March backup of
> ~120 names.
> 
> I took the latest master db from my genealogy partner (we always do ftp
> transfers, which should have integrity checking) and followed Ron's
> suggestion:
> 
> I opened the file, did check/repair, did control-b backup, closed,
> restored from that backup, saved, made a copy, imported the copy, got
> spurious differences on the merge - but only about 20 differences this
> time.
> 
> Meanwhile, I have a completely different database (different family)
> which I've not touched since May 9th 2005. I merged two copies, it did
> merge without any differences. So, yes, the problem may well be specific
> to the one database.
> 
> Sherry, when Millenia's able to take a look, please let me know, and
> we'll give you the current database for repair.
> 
> Thanks for the help everyone with the suggestions, and in verifying the
> problem!
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
>  Ed Barnard, maybe a legacy deluxe user again soon
> 
> 
> On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 15:26, Wm Voss wrote:
> > I imported your Original into your Clone and ran IntellShare/Merge and 
> > got 89 records that could not be auto merged, just as you did. I copied 
> > the pairs of notes out of a dozen records and did a file compare in 
> > UltraEdit; none showed any difference at all. I also did compares on the 
> > full family files and on exported gedcoms; no difference found in either.
> > 
> > Beats me what's going on, but I'd sure not trust it until someone 
> > figures out the problem.
> > 
> > Wm Voss
> 
> Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> 
> To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
> 
> To unsubscribe please visit:
> http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> 
> To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
> 
> To unsubscribe please visit:
> http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/

To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to