On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 08:10:27 -0500, "Dick Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there a reason why Legacy could not automatically correct this potential >problem? I have 39 pages of children that are not sorted >correctly - I can not think of a reason why I would not want them sorted in >order. > >Any reason why to let them remain in an unsorted order? If not, can this be >added to Legacy to automatically do? It took years just to get this added to the Potential Problems report. I think that's about all we can hope for. -- Dennis M. Kowallek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ****************** Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
