Hi Peter,
I'm sure it could but at present we have both options and it is not a
problem to sort which ever way if needed. Personally I tend to find that
almost anything done "automatically" tends to limit choice and is a great
way of introducing bugs!
Ron Ferguson
____________________________________
For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
View Individual Trees
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/Grimshaw/
____________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 01 February 2006 22:10
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V6 - Potential Problems - Children sorted order
That could probably be done on an "opt out" or "manual override" basis.
Peter Holmes
Western Australia
[HOLMES (Witham on the Hill, Pinchbeck, Donington and then
Leicestershire),
DAVISON (Donington), CRAGG (Leicestershire & Nottinghamshire), RYLOTT &
WITHERINGTON (Gosberton, Gosberton Clough)] [Villages are in Lincolnshire]
Enter the drawing for a FREE Legacy Cruise to Alaska or a FREE research trip to
Salt Lake's Family History Library. Open to users of Legacy 6 Deluxe. Enter
online at http://legacyfamilytree.com/FreeTrip.asp
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
