Richard Fairhurst wrote: >Third case: there's an explicit clause (4.6) that a derivative >database protected by technological measures (such as one sealed in >a satnav) must also be made available in unrestricted form.
This clause requires that the unrestricted copy be "at least as accessible to the recipient as a practical matter as the restricted Database". Is "accessible" here just a way to ensure that you can always get data out of a proprietary system (i.e., your satnav should come with a copy of the data in an easily parseable form like .osm)? Or is it to require that users be able to do the same things with the unrestricted copy as they can with the restricted copy (i.e., your satnav must accept .osm data as well as its proprietary version of that data)? -dair ___________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.refnum.com/ _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk
