"Peter Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2008-February/000680.html
>
> I was concerned to see that the answers received were not conclusive and
> that no response has been given by a qualified lawyer. With regard to the
> brief for this licence and the acceptance procedure for the completed
> licence I recommend that we: [...]

Bully for you.  What's in it for other participants?  More abuse that
they can't give conclusive answers and aren't not qualified lawyers?

Sorry if I'm coming into this cold from the outside, but I really
don't see why any readers would help this apparently-tangential
licence project.  The email linked above was also rather indirect "can
I suggest ..." (Sgt Wilson?) rather than saying what you seem to want.
I'm surprised it got two answers, but I guess this list is nicer than
what I've seen before.

Regards,
-- 
MJ Ray (slef)
Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small
worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
(Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to