"Peter Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2008-February/000680.html > > I was concerned to see that the answers received were not conclusive and > that no response has been given by a qualified lawyer. With regard to the > brief for this licence and the acceptance procedure for the completed > licence I recommend that we: [...]
Bully for you. What's in it for other participants? More abuse that they can't give conclusive answers and aren't not qualified lawyers? Sorry if I'm coming into this cold from the outside, but I really don't see why any readers would help this apparently-tangential licence project. The email linked above was also rather indirect "can I suggest ..." (Sgt Wilson?) rather than saying what you seem to want. I'm surprised it got two answers, but I guess this list is nicer than what I've seen before. Regards, -- MJ Ray (slef) Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ (Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237 _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk