Hi, > Bully for you. What's in it for other participants? More abuse that > they can't give conclusive answers and aren't not qualified lawyers?
Well perhaps you're coming "cold from the outside" as you say, you have missed one thing: The Foundation has been pushing this new license specifically saying: Look, we've got this excellent lawyer who is working with us to make the license right for everyone. - So Peter can hardly be blamed for hoping that a qualified lawyer might answer his questions, because one of the main advantages of the new license is hoping it will get us out of the legal swamp we're in with the old one. > Sorry if I'm coming into this cold from the outside, but I really > don't see why any readers would help this apparently-tangential > licence project. What appears to be tangential about the license project, and to whom does it appear so? Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk
