MJ Ray wrote: > Doesn't being a criminal act mean that the state can investigate (and > prosecute) without waiting for OSMF's lawyers to act?
Yes. I apologize for mis-emphasizing this. I'd still say it's a vanishingly small threat, although one that should be made to vanish through a clear statement or licence. > [...] >> But guidelines on trademark use would be good. In particular, the OSM >> trademark should serve the traditional purpose for trademarks of >> protecting consumers from inferior knock-offs. >> e.g - http://www.debian.org/trademark > > Yes and I feel the OpenJDK Trademark Notice would be a more complete > example. Best practice examples are very useful. OpenJDK's notice is here - http://openjdk.java.net/legal/openjdk-trademark-notice.html - Rob.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
