On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:08:58AM +0000, Peter Miller wrote: >> I do not read the ODbL this way. I read that only persons bound by the >> license/contract are prohibited from reverse engineering. >> Clarification here is needed. > > When we find an issue like this then lets document it on the wiki and > move on to the next topic. We have identified at least two so far, 1) > When is a 'DB and derived DB' and now 'what licensing applies to > Produced Works and how does the 'no reverse engineering' clause work > with PD images.
This sounds like brushing the issue aside, putting it in the neverending inbox to deal with “at some point”. I’d prefer people carry on discussing issues, here _and_ on the wiki, and in the comments of the licence draft. The more the issues are recognised, the better the chance of having them dealt with. Simon -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
