On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:59:52 -0400, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > > How?
By acknowledging their existence and using them against themselves. > Upgrading from BY-SA 2.0 to BY-SA 2.5 is trivial. Relicencing derivative works is trivial. Getting the approval of every OSM user to approve a change of attribution isn't. There are major institutional contributions to OSM that might not be able to be re-attributed without great effort. And some people (mistakenly) regard that attribution as a "right". So changing attribution is comparably difficult to relicencing. > Personally I disagree with that hallucination. A mash-up is a derivative > work. In fact, I'd say it's pretty much the quintessential example of the > derivative work. I agree with you. But the community standards of OSM don't seem to. - Rob. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
