Hi,

Rob Myers wrote:
As does OSM's existing CC-BY-SA 2.0 licence.

I believe such an upgrade path was how Wikipedia changed from GFDL to CC-BY-SA, wasn't it? They got the makers of GFDL to release a newer version of GFDL that would provide an upgrade window.

If Creative Commons had been more friendly towards the data licensing issue, a similar window could have been opened in a hypothetical CC-BY-SA 3.1; alas they had their own plans (and saying to them "You guys have more money than God, and I think you want to own this space, and I think you're trying to stop dissent from your Vision." when they popped up here to discuss probably didn't help).

Bye
Frederik

--
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to