On 16 November 2010 23:08, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > If Creative Commons had been more friendly towards the data licensing issue, > a similar window could have been opened in a hypothetical CC-BY-SA 3.1;
They could probably make ODbL a compatible license but that wouldn't satisfy those wanting the ability to upgrade to another free and open license, let alone all the rights granted in the current Contributor Terms. These people would still want everything that is used by OSM under ODbL to be re-mapped from scratch. Of course Creative Commons could in theory make PDDL a compatible license, or something else that supposedly satisfies the CT, but that would hurt so many other projects, authors, artists, who used a CC license. Cheers _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
